DFS Building Blocks – Week 9
Whew. I hope you didn’t get too excited when one or two or even three of your players went off last week as your roster needed about nine players to go off. We noted that we were comfortable passing on some of the chalk RB options because there were a lot of other viable options at much lower ownership. Henry and CMC came through. Foreman came through. A lot of players came through last week, meaning you probably scored a ton of points and didn’t make any money. I had a lineup with Henry, CMC, and Pollard… and it didn’t cash. I had a lineup with Henry, Kamara, and Pollard… and it didn’t cash.
One thing to point out is good chaulk. We talked about Pollard being potentially the highest owned player of the year, but he was still worth it. We lean toward fading players at high ownership, but when they’re such a good play, we just go along with the crowd. He was around 50% in the $5 tourneys, but as you moved up to $55, and up to $555 you saw his ownership increase all the way to over 80%! That just illustrates the point that sharp players are eating good chalk but pivoting away from bad chalk. We can find plenty of examples in the other direction, chalk plays being highly owned at lower stakes, but lower owned at higher stakes.
We also talked about using the Cowboys DEF paired with Pollard as a way to lessen the impact of that ownership. The Cowboys DEF, while not world beaters last week (and a little lucky to get a TD) was only 11% owned and finished as the third highest scoring DEF, giving us a relatively unique and valuable Pollard + Cowboys DEF stack. When we eat good chalk, we’ll find other ways to differentiate our lineups.
Initial Reactions
This week looks like a heavy chalk week, with a couple nice spots to differentiate. Because it appears to be a heavy chalk week, it also presents a nice case for a secondary lineup full of pivots. We don’t have nearly as many attractive RB plays as last week. And nothing really jumps out at TE and DEF this week, making that a spot we can probably get some advantage.
Game Overviews
Atlanta Falcons * | Los Angeles Chargers | 3(-110) | 140 | 23.25 | 49.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Los Angeles Chargers | Atlanta Falcons * | -3(-110) | -165 | 26.25 | 49.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Highest over/under of the week with a close spread. Doesn’t seem like the spread should be this close but Atlanta has been playing in competitive games. Mike Williams and Keenan Allen both out which means more work for Ekeler, Everett, and Palmer or Carter. Ekeler is going to be popular, but he’s good chalk. He’ll probably be a lock for our main lineup. Everett, at first glance, is the most attractive TE to me. He’s relatively popular but we don’t have to worry about ownership at the TE position as much. An Ekeler + Everett mini-stack is a nice way to attack this game. I like Allgeier again on the other side, but with Taylor out and Jackson starting for the Colts, we’ve got other RB value options. Pitts is too popular and too expensive for me, so I’ll likely just stick to the Chargers side of this one, unless I find a lineup that has Allgeier + Palmer perhaps and fades Ekeler.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Ekeler + Everett
Herbert + Ekeler
Herbert + Ekeler + Everett/Palmer
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Ekeler
Everett
Palmer
Allgeier
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Allgeier + Palmer/Everett
Mariota + Ekeler + London/Pitts
Herbert + Allgeier + Palmer/Everett
Detroit Lions * | Green Bay Packers | 3.5(-110) | 150 | 23 | 49.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Green Bay Packers | Detroit Lions * | -3.5(-110) | -185 | 26.5 | 49.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Tied for highest over/under of the week and a close spread. We did nice on our Rodgers to Jones receiving connection a few weeks ago and this game screams Aaron Jones again. The problem is that it screams Aaron Jones to 30% of the field, putting him into fade consideration. Now, I tend to think he’s good chalk this week coming in cheaper than Ekeler, but he’s not as strong a lock as Ekeler. Since no DEF really stands out, I want to take a shot at getting really unique and stacking Jones + Packers DEF. This shouldn’t be the shootout that Miami and Detroit was so there’s a better chance that the Packers DEF can be viable here, although the matchup is in Detroit. We’ll see how our lineups look. You could also easily make a pivot from Jones and just go with Rodgers + Doubs, although he’s a little popular himself. And Tonyan is expected to be the highest owned TE. With popular receiving options, I’m more likely to just eat the chalk on Jones and find other places to differentiate my lineup.
On the Lions side, people tend to be St. Brown or bust, but I’m looking at Swift, with a nice matchup, at tiny ownership. The Jamaal Williams TDs last week crushed the Swift owners, making him a really nice game theory pivot this week. You can even make a case for Swift + Lions DEF since Green Bay has looked so bad. But we know we don’t expect Rodgers to deliver a bunch of turnovers. Williams is also low owned, as is Dillon on the Packers side. All reasonable pivots. The other place to look is the Lions TE options without Hockenson now. Wright and Mitchell are both in play as super cheap options who could get into the end zone.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Jones + Packers DEF
Rodgers + Jones
Jones + St. Brown
Goff + Jones + St. Brown
Jones + Mitchell/Wright
Rodgers + Doubs + St. Brown
Rodgers + Swift + Doubs/Tonyan
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Jones
St. Brown
Swift
Williams
Mitchell/Wright
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Swift/Williams + Lions DEF
Dillon + Packers DEF
Goff + Dillon + St. Brown
Goff + Jones + St. Brown + Mitchell/Wright
Arizona Cardinals * | Seattle Seahawks | -2(-110) | -125 | 25.5 | 49 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 05:05 |
Seattle Seahawks | Arizona Cardinals * | 2(-110) | 105 | 23.5 | 49 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 05:05 |
What a difference De’Andre Hopkins makes! I’m still of the mindset that this game will be lower scoring than this line suggests, with both defenses playing pretty good. We’ve pointed out multiple times that Arizona is solid against WRs making this a spot we can target Dissly or Fant again, especially in a week without a lot of top TE options. I don’t mind taking a shot on Eno Benjamin here or Ken Walker, but mostly I’ll be staying away from this game. If you’re going with “Vegas knows” though play this game as a full overstack banking on it going way over it’s total.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Murray + Walker + Hopkins
Benjamin + Dissly/Fant
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Walker
Benjamin
Dissly/Fant
Moore
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Murray + Walker + Hopkins + Moore/Ertz
Murray + Walker + Hopkins + Lockett/Metcalf/Dissly/Fant
Smith + Lockett + Hopkins
Smith + Hopkins + Dissly/Fant
Walker + Seahawks DEF
Benjamin + Cardinals DEF
Jacksonville Jaguars * | Las Vegas Raiders | 2(-110) | 110 | 23 | 48 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Las Vegas Raiders | Jacksonville Jaguars * | -2(-110) | -130 | 25 | 48 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
This is the first game that stands out when talking about a non-chalk approach. This game feels likes a great bounce-back candidate and a great overstack candidate for our secondary lineup. Jacobs was a dud after tearing up the previous three weeks. Adams was sick and now gives us a chance to get a cheaper Adams at relatively low ownership. Etienne looks to be a in a nice spot, although he’s popular. Kirk seems forgotten. This is a spot where we can target both teams’ primary options in a game stack without sacrificing ownership leverage. That’s a great spot to be in.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Jacobs + Adams
Jacobs + Adams + Kirk
Carr + Jacobs + Adams + Kirk
Carr + Jacobs + Etienne + Adams + Kirk
Jacobs + Etienne + Adams
Carr + Etienne + Adams
Lawrence + Jacobs + Kirk + Adams
Lawrence + Etienne + Kirk + Adams
Lawrence + Etienne + Jacobs
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Jacobs
Adams
Etienne
Kirk
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Moreau
Carr + Jacobs + Moreau
Waller
Carr + Adams + Waller
Carr + Jacobs + Waller
Zay Jones/Marvin Jones
Lawrence + Jacobs + Jones/Jones + Adams
New York Jets * | Buffalo Bills | 11.5(-110) | 425 | 17.25 | 46 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Buffalo Bills | New York Jets * | -11.5(-110) | -600 | 28.75 | 46 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Bills as big favorites. We’ve seen this scenario a few times and must ask ourselves again how they get to those points? Even in games where we expect them to lean on the run, they do seem to stick to the pass. This is the perfect matchup for Gabe Davis who scores TDs in bunches when he scores them, making him a great tournament player. Allen is the most popular QB and with people just auto-playing Diggs, Davis is a nice pivot at a much friendlier price. And, we could pivot entirely, and move down to Singletary. I like this play as his ownership should be lower with people assuming he’s going to lose his passing game work. He might, but it might not be this week. And maybe they feed him more as a primary runner now. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Singletary with two-TDs at the end of this game. I’ve played around with some rosters that ended up with Singletary at the flex because his price seems too low for his role on a team that is a huge favorite. Singletary TDs are direct leverage off of Allen and Diggs ownership. I’m not touching anything on the Jets, although they make a strong case for a game theory DEF in a lottery-pick lineup or even in your main if you’re fading Bills players.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Allen + Davis
Singletary + Bills DEF
Singletary + Davis (could potentially capture all the Bills TDs with this stack)
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Davis
Diggs
Singletary
Allen
Knox
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Wilson + Singletary + Wilson
Allen + Davis + Wilson + Knox
Robinson + Jets DEF
Jets DEF
Wilson + Carter + Diggs/Davis/Knox
Chicago Bears * | Miami Dolphins | 4(-110) | 165 | 20.75 | 45.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Miami Dolphins | Chicago Bears * | -4(-110) | -200 | 24.75 | 45.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Last week we took the ownership leverage and played Waddle over Hill. We could easily fire that one up again, but this does seem like a spot for some Hill TD regression. The problem is he’s the most popular WR on the slate. If we go to Hill, we have a surprisingly easy way to differentiate our lineups… Justin Fields. Fields has hit over 3x this price in the last two weeks against better defenses. No reason to think he can’t do it again here. A naked Fields + Hill lineup is a great way to target this game. Or, take even more leverage, and go Fields + Waddle. I don’t have a lot of interest in the other pieces of this game, although I did build a lineup that found Mooney as the cheap piece that filled out my roster, but I’m not going out of my way to add him to Fields. Mostert should be popular, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Wilson mixed in more than we think since he’s familiar with the offense already.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Fields + Hill
Fields + Waddle
Fields + Hill + Waddle
Tua + Hill + Waddle + Dolphins DEF
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Hill
Waddle
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Gesicki
Fields + Mooney + Hill/Waddle
Tua + Montgomery/Herbert + Hill + Waddle
Montgomery + Bears DEF
Mostert + Dolphins DEF
Washington Commanders * | Minnesota Vikings | 3(-105) | 140 | 20.25 | 43.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Minnesota Vikings | Washington Commanders * | -3(-115) | -165 | 23.25 | 43.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
This game looks like another potential spot to stack up and differentiate from the chalk. If going way from Hill in your lineup, Justin Jefferson has a great matchup and seems a little forgotten. Maybe he reminds us who he is. There’s even a path to jam Hill and Jefferson into your lineup if you take on some value and risk at DEF. Thielen is always in play for his TD potential. McLaurin looks great with Heinicke. Heinicke is even playable. I’m staying away from both running games as this should be a Vikings passing attack and Washington is too much of a committee. That said, any Washington RB makes a nice lottery pick for that reason.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Jefferson + McLaurin
Cousins + Jefferson + Thielen + McLaurin
Heinicke + Jefferson + McLaurin
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Jefferson
Thielen
McLaurin (rather play him in a stack though)
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Cook + Vikings DEF
Robinson/Gibson
McKissic
Logan Thomas
Cincinnati Bengals * | Carolina Panthers | -7.5(-105) | -350 | 25 | 42.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Carolina Panthers | Cincinnati Bengals * | 7.5(-115) | 260 | 17.5 | 42.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
No Chase, but this feels like a really low total for a team as explosive as Cincinnati and a Carolina team that is playing well. Gasp. We’ve seen situations where injuries narrow our options on a team and this is one of those. Mixon, Higgins, Boyd, Hurst all in play. PJ Walker isn’t getting any respect but he’s been right around 3x this price the last two weeks. He’s a great salary saver this week who can be played without a stacking partner. But it’s also easy to get down to Marshall or Shenault as cheap pieces to fill out your lineup (making it viable to get to Hill + Jefferson lineups). You could run that back with Hurst or Mixon. If I can’t fit Fields in, Walker is probably my QB this week. And Foreman continues to shine when given the opportunity, although his price is starting to reflect it. Moore is coming on and his price still seems pretty cheap. All of these plays probably need to the game to outperform it’s expected total, but that’s what makes it a good stack in tournaments.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Burrow + Higgins + Boyd
Walker + Mixon
Burrow + Foreman + Higgins + Boyd/Hurst
Walker + Mixon + Moore/Marshall/Shenault
Mixon + Bengals DEF
Foreman + Panthers DEF (remember what they did to the Bucs)
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Higgins
Boyd
Hurst
Mixon
Foreman
Moore
Walker
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Walker + Mixon + Marshall + Shenault
Tampa Bay Buccaneers * | Los Angeles Rams | -3(-105) | -155 | 22.75 | 42.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 05:25 |
Los Angeles Rams | Tampa Bay Buccaneers * | 3(-115) | 130 | 19.75 | 42.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 05:25 |
Weird to see this game at the bottom of the list, but that’s the reality this year. Do both teams keep stinking? Or do both get into a shootout this week? Or does one rise to the top? Does Brady put on a show for the ladies??
I like the potential to stack this game. We’ve had success (seems like years ago) with Brady + Evans + Godwin and this game sets up as a passing game. Kupp is popular. Godwin is popular. Evans is down the list pretty far and has a ton of TD potential. I’m either going to full stack this game or just go with Brady + Evans + maybe Kupp. You can take a shot on the other side as well starting with Stafford and Kupp if you want. This game is really about picking a story and taking a chance. Maybe Vegas is right and this game stinks and you avoid it all together. Maybe you take a shot on Julio Jones or Rachaad White. Fournette is a little too popular for the way this game sets up and his recent performance.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Brady + Evans + Kupp
Brady + Evans + Godwin + Kupp
Brady + Evans + Higbee
Brady + Evans + Jones/Otton + Kupp
Stafford + Kupp + Evans
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Evans
Kupp
Godwin
Higbee
Otton
Van Jefferson
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Brady + White + Kupp
Stafford + Evans + Jefferson
Stafford + Fournette + Kupp
Fournette + Bucs DEF
Akers
Akers + Rams DEF
New England Patriots * | Indianapolis Colts | -5.5(-110) | -250 | 23 | 40.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Indianapolis Colts | New England Patriots * | 5.5(-110) | 200 | 17.5 | 40.5 | Sun, Nov 6, 2022 02:00 |
Deon Jackson or bust. Tough matchup but he’s the starter with no Hines around. He’s super cheap and should get a ton of touches. He might not get 30 points, but he’s a great chance to get his 3x simply by volume. He’s the most popular play of the week and doesn’t have Pollard upside, but he’s also cheaper than Pollard was last week. I’ll be locking him in (might fade him in my secondary lineup). I like Ehlinger who should run more, but would rather play Fields or Walker this week. I like Pierce, but mostly just staying away from this game outside of Jackson. You could make a play for Stevenson + Patriots DEF, especially in a lineup that fades Jackson. But it’s viable even with Jackson. And you could go deeper and play Harris + Patriots DEF. A Jackson + Patriots DEF lineup would instantly remove the impact of the 50% ownership on Jackson.
Building Blocks (stacks to build around)
Stevenson/Harris + Patriots DEF
Jackson + Colts DEF
Individual Plays (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Jackson
Stevenson
Lottery Picks (players that can be rostered alone to fill out your lineups that are built around other stacks)
Harris
Pierce
Ehlinger
Ehlinger + Stevenson + Pierce
Ehlinger + Jackson + Meyers
Jones + Jackson + Meyers
The Lineup Build
We’re all over the chalk this week, with a couple ways to differentiate our lineups. We’ll definitely have one primary lineup and one secondary lineup that looks for clear pivots from the chalk and hedges against our primary build. Jackson is super popular, so a secondary that features the Patriots DEF is a smart play.
FD
Starting with my locks and studs that I want to jam in. Ekeler + Jackson + Hill + Jefferson + Davis. Fields at QB opposite Hill. I need to save at TE and while I like Everett, since I have Ekeler already I can drop down to Logan Thomas opposite Jefferson. I’ll work from the bottom up on DEF and add Detroit since I’m fading Jones and the other Packers, might as well get the added leverage of Detroit DEF. You could move up to Carolina DEF, which has a better chance of performing well. I don’t love my flex, but I can add Drake London opposite Ekeler. That’s a team full of mini-stacks, some clear studs, some players with big TD potential, a nice ownerhip play with Fields, and a hold-on-to-the-seat-of-your-pants play with the Lions DEF. There are plenty of viable options below London if you want to drop down at flex and “upgrade” at DEF. The problem is all the other options aren’t much better than the Lions or Panthers, so might as well take your shot with salary savings at DEF this week. MIA DEF is projecting to be the highest owned, so Fields gives us additional leverage against that.
I’ll be playing around with lineups built around Brady + Evans and the Raiders/Jags game for my secondary lineup. Likely will fade Ekeler and play Everett at TE or Palmer at WR. May fade Jackson and play Patriots DEF there. Or go with Foreman + Panthers DEF. I like getting Singletary into my secondary lineup. I like Allgeier opposite either Everett or Palmer.
DK
Starting with Etienne as he’s too cheap here. I like targeting Jones here at much lower ownership than on FD. I’ll add St. Brown. I’ll add Mitchell at TE as a dirt cheap option and building on that game stack. I’ll add Palmer since I’m fading Ekeler and Everett here. I’ll add Fields + Hill. And I’ll round it out with Foreman + Panthers DEF.
Yahoo
I’ll build my Brady stack here with Evans + Julio Jones. I’ll add Higbee at TE. I’ll add Aaron Jones. I’ll get my Devin Singletary exposure here. I’ll pair Ekeler + Chargers DEF. And I can fit Tyreek Hill in.